VISUALIZATION APPROACHES FOR STIRRED TANK BIOREACTORS

Armands Bušs, Normunds Jēkabsons, Artūrs Šuleiko, Dagnija Loča, Juris Vanags


Last modified: 17.04.2019

Abstract

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is the analysis of fluid behaviour employing numerical solution methods. Using CFD it is possible to analyse simple and complex fluid-gas, fluid-fluid or fluid-solid interactions. Fluid dynamics is described with laws of physics in the form of partial differential equations also known as Navier-Stokes equations. Sophisticated CFD solvers transform these laws into algebraic equations which are solved by numerical methods. In this paper Ansys CFX and Fluent analysis systems as research methods are used to visualize flow patterns in a stirred tank bioreactor. The results obtained are informative and can be used to improve the yield of biomass. CFD analysis can save time and aid fluid system designing process. This approach is cheaper and faster compared to conventional build-and-test process. However, it should be noted that CFD analysis results are as accurate as the level of skill possessed by a CFD engineer therefore there are still place for hands-on testing. Authors have developed a stirred tank model and visualized flow patterns. The research presents experimental computation methods and the model setup key parameters. The developed model allows to predict flow patterns inside stirred systems and evaluate efficiency of the mixing process by analysing parameters such as velocity field, turbulence eddy frequency, shear strain rate and power input.

Keywords


Ansys CFX/Fluent; CFD; bioreactor; stirred tank

References


[1]   K. M. Dhanasekharan and J. L. Kokini, “Design and scaling of wheat dough extrusion by numerical simulation of flow and heat transfer,” J. Food Eng., vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 421–430, 2003.

[2]   J. Liang and E. W. C. Lim, “Evaluation of RANS Turbulence Models, les and des for CFD Simulations of Bubbling, Turbulent and Core-Annular Fluidization,” J. Chem. Eng. Japan, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 646–663, 2018.

[3]   F. T. Hong, “Magnetic field effects on biomolecules, cells, and living organisms,” BioSystems, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 187–229, 1995.

[4]   K. Fijałkowski, P. Nawrotek, M. Struk, M. Kordas, and R. Rakocz, “The effects of rotating magnetic field on growth rate, cell metabolic activity and biofilm formation by staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli,” J. Magn., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 289–296, 2013.

[5]   M. Konopacki and R. Rakoczy, “The analysis of rotating magnetic field as a trigger of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria growth,” Biochem. Eng. J., vol. 141, no. 15, pp. 259–267, 2019.

[6]   C. Johnson, V. Natarajan, and C. Antoniou, “Verification of energy dissipation rate scalability in pilot and production scale bioreactors using computational fluid dynamics,” Biotechnol. Prog., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 760–764, 2014.

[7]   S. Tavoularis and U. Karnik, “Further experiments on the evolution of turbulent stresses and scales in uniformly sheared turbulence,” J. Fluid Mech., vol. 204, pp. 457–478, 1989.

[8]   J. A. Sánchez Pérez, E. M. Rodríguez Porcel, J. L. Casas López, J. M. Fernández Sevilla, and Y. Chisti, “Shear rate in stirred tank and bubble column bioreactors,” Chem. Eng. J., vol. 124, no. 1–3, pp. 1–5, 2006.

[9]   V. N. Vlachakis, P. P. Vlachos, D. P. Telionis, M. R. Brady, and R. H. Yoon, “Turbulence Characteristics in a Rushton Stirring Vessel: A Numerical Investigation,” in ASME 2006 2nd Joint U.S.-European Fluids Engineering Summer Meeting Collocated With the 14th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, 2008, pp. 19–26.

[10] D. A. Guertin and D. M. Sabatini, “Cell Size Control,” Encyclopedia of Life Sciences. pp. 1–10, 2005.

[11] W. Hu, C. Berdugo, and J. J. Chalmers, “The potential of hydrodynamic damage to animal cells of industrial relevance: Current understanding,” Cytotechnology, vol. 63, no. 5, p. 445, 2011.

[12] T. Tanzeglock, M. Soos, G. Stephanopoulos, and M. Morbidelli, “Induction of mammalian cell death by simple shear and extensional flows,” Biotechnol. Bioeng., vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 360–370, 2009.