• Home
  • SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION
  • International Scientific Conference "SOCIETY, INTEGRATION, EDUCATION - SIE2020"
  • Higher Education Pedagogy
  • Ciekurs

    • EFFECTS OF FEEDBACK NN SKILLS DURING CARDIOPULMONAL REANIMATION TRAINING

    Rafaels Ciekurs, Reinis Balmaks


    Last modified: 22.01.2020

    Abstract

    Sudden cardiac arrest is one of the main causes of death in Europe. Early initiation and qualitative performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation can reduce mortality. In order to perform cardio-pulmonary resuscitation of appropriate quality, theoretical and practical knowledge is needed which can be improved by clinical simulation. The aim of the study was to find out the effect of feedback on participants' skills during cardiopulmonary resuscitation training. Hypothesis - feedback improves participants' skills during cardiopulmonary resuscitation training. Research Method - randomized controlled simulation study. Research instruments - observation protocol, questionnaire. A total of 32 employees of State Emergency Medical Service (medical practitioners) participated in the study. The hypothesis was confirmed - feedback improves participants' skills during cardiopulmonary resuscitation training. The total evaluation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the intervention group, which performed the cardiopulmonary resuscitation scenario with the feedback function is higher (92,13%) compared to the control group (77%). Most of the participants in the intervention group fully agree that the use of feedback function during training improves the overall cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills. The results of the study indicate that the development of cardiopulmonary resuscitation training programs for medical students and practitioners requires the inclusion of practical activities with clinical simulations with feedback.

    Keywords


    cardiopulmonary resuscitation; clinical simulation; feedback

    References


    Deering, S. & Rowland, J. (2013). Obstetric emergency simulation. Semin. Perinatol. Vol.37(3), 179-188.

    Fernandez, E. & Williams, D.G. (2009). Training and the European working time directive: A 7 year review of paediatricanaesthetic trainee caseload data. Br J Anaesth, 103(4), 566–569.

    Iskrzycki, L., et al. (2018). The impact of the use of a CPRMeter monitor  on quality of chest compressions: a prospective randomised trial, cross-simulation. Kardiologia Polska 2018; 76(3), 574–579.

    Jones F., Passos-Neto, C.E., & MelroBraghiroli O.F. (2015). Simulation in Medical Education: Brief history and methodology. Principles and Practice of Clinical Research. A Global Journal in Clinical Research, 1(2), 56-63.

    Krage, R., et al. (2014). Does individual experience affect performance during cardiopulmonary resuscitation with additional external distractors? Anaesthesia, 69(9), 983-989.

    Leape, L.L. & Berwick, D.M. (2005). Five years after To Err is Human: what have we learned? JAMA J Am Med Assoc, 293(3), 2384–2390.

    Laerdal. Helping save lives. Creating quality lifesavers. Little Anne QCPR. [06.12.2018.]. Retrieved from https://www.laerdal.com/gb/products/simulation-training/resuscitation-training/little-anne-qcpr/?fbclid=IwAR1R4lZYoWhC-p2CCBHwVuVow1zVJ4XoVNnIzjnIb3i8AOAKKYew6mzLcfE

    Madenci, A.L., Solis, C.V. & De Moya M.A. (2014). Central venous access by trainees: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of simulation to improve success rate on patients. Simul. Healthc., 9(1), 7-14.

    McCoy C.E., et al. (2019). Randomized Controlled Trial of Simulation vs. Standard Training for Teaching Medical Students High-quality Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. West J Emerg Med, Jan; 20(1), 15–22.

    Medley, C. & Horne, C. (2005). Using simulation technology for undergraduate nursing education. Journal of Nursing Education, 44(1), 31-34.

    Mullen, L. & Byrd, D. (2013). Using simulation training to improve perioperative patient safety. Aorn. J., 97(4), 419-427.

    Paull, D.E., et al. (2013). The effect of simulation-based crew resource management training on measurable teamwork and communication among interprofessional teams caring for postoperative patients. J. Contin. Educ. Nurs., 44(11), 516-524.

    Ricketts, B. (2011). The role of simulation for learning within pre-registration nursing education: A literature review. Nurse Education Today, 31, 650-654.

    Robertson, K., Garrity, T., & Maher, B. (2014). Using simulation to foster patient-centred care. Nurs. Times, 110(25), 21-23.

    Stroud, L. & Cavalcanti, R.B. (2013). Hybrid simulation for knee arthrocentesis: improving fidelity in procedures training. J. Gen. Intern. Med., 28(5), 723-727

    Valler-Jones, T., Meechan, R., & Jones, H. (2011). Simulated practice: A panacea for health education? British Journal of Nursing, 20(1), 628-631.

    Zhou, X.,L., et al. (2019). Quality retention of chest compression after repetitive practices with or without feedback devices: A randomized manikin study. American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 6.

     

     
    © Rēzeknes Tehnoloģiju akadēmija